In Search of Africa’s Future Farmers

 

Against this backdrop, we also have the largest population ever of young people in the developing world. In all, there are roughly 1.5 billion people aged 12-24 worldwide, 1.3 billion of whom live in developing countries. Sub-Saharan Africa is home to over 200 million young people, three quarters residing in rural areas. Growth in the population of African youth is not projected to peak for another 20 years. Ironically, while there are more young people in the African population, across the continent the ageing of the farming population is causing concern. Young people are choosing not to pursue livelihoods in the agriculture sector, especially as farmers.

Recent policy dialogues on the future of food and farming facilitated by the Future Agricultures Consortium’s Ethiopia team point to the fact that it is not just the youth who have an aversion to farming. Their parents often hold the same view, preferring their children to move away from rural areas entirely because they associate rural life with poverty.

A recent IDS-University of Ghana study of young people in cocoa farming communities paints a mixed picture of attitudes towards farming, but with strong indications that cocoa farming is not seen as an attractive area of work. The minority who could see a future for themselves in cocoa farming all expressed a wish not to farm in the same way as their small-holder parents. Rather, they saw themselves managing mechanised farms with more technical inputs.

These changing aspirations present considerable challenges and opportunities – for young people themselves, for rural communities and for the agricultural sector. While young Africans are increasingly mobile, many still live in rural areas, and agriculture and rural employment will continue to play a key role in the livelihoods of many. Thus, productivity-led agricultural growth is needed to create forward and backward linkages and new rural employment opportunities.

But what is the scope for agricultural growth and rising employment in different parts of rural Africa? What policies should African countries adopt to support growth that maximises employment creation? What programmes can be developed and implemented that will benefit large numbers of rural youth? What activities and approaches – training and education, strengthening of rural organisations, investments in new technologies, value addition and income-generation, etc. – will give Africa’s rural youth the knowledge and skills they need to benefit from and contribute to more vibrant rural economies? Researchers and policy makers have only just begun to consider these questions.§

Jennifer Leavy
December 2009

 

Smallholder Agriculture in Ethiopia

By Samuel Gebreselassie
Policy Brief 001

Land, Land Policy and Smallholder Agriculture in Ethiopia Land and land tenure is a hot policy issue in Ethiopia. Three key issues are raised – farm size and fragmentation and the question of what is a ‘viable’ farm unit; tenure security and whether lack of land registration/certification or titling undermines investment in productivity improvements; and finally the issue land markets and whether imperfectly functioning markets constrain opportunities for land consolidation, investment and agricultural growth.{jcomments off}

 

In Search of Africa’s Future Farmers

{jathumbnail off}©FAO/Simon Maina / FAOThe economic, social and cultural contexts of agriculture are changing fast, as evidenced by significant shifts in the patterns of food production and consumption. An increasingly globalised world also means that there is now greater access to fast-evolving communication and media technology, which improves information flows and adds to the feeling that the world is getting smaller. However, development and growth processes still move at different speeds in different locations, even within countries.These inequalities are increasingly visible to people living in remote rural areas, often characterised by under-investment and slow growth.

Against this backdrop, we also have the largest population ever of young people in the developing world. In all, there are roughly 1.5 billion people aged 12-24 worldwide, 1.3 billion of whom live in developing countries. Sub-Saharan Africa is home to over 200 million young people, three quarters residing in rural areas. Growth in the population of African youth is not projected to peak for another 20 years. Ironically, while there are more young people in the African population, across the continent the ageing of the farming population is causing concern. Young people are choosing not to pursue livelihoods in the agriculture sector, especially as farmers.

Recent policy dialogues on the future of food and farming facilitated by the Future Agricultures Consortium’s Ethiopia team point to the fact that it is not just the youth who have an aversion to farming. Their parents often hold the same view, preferring their children to move away from rural areas entirely because they associate rural life with poverty.

A recent IDS-University of Ghana study of young people in cocoa farming communities paints a mixed picture of attitudes towards farming, but with strong indications that cocoa farming is not seen as an attractive area of work. The minority who could see a future for themselves in cocoa farming all expressed a wish not to farm in the same way as their small-holder parents. Rather, they saw themselves managing mechanised farms with more technical inputs.

These changing aspirations present considerable challenges and opportunities – for young people themselves, for rural communities and for the agricultural sector. While young Africans are increasingly mobile, many still live in rural areas, and agriculture and rural employment will continue to play a key role in the livelihoods of many. Thus, productivity-led agricultural growth is needed to create forward and backward linkages and new rural employment opportunities.

But what is the scope for agricultural growth and rising employment in different parts of rural Africa? What policies should African countries adopt to support growth that maximises employment creation? What programmes can be developed and implemented that will benefit large numbers of rural youth? What activities and approaches – training and education, strengthening of rural organisations, investments in new technologies, value addition and income-generation, etc. – will give Africa’s rural youth the knowledge and skills they need to benefit from and contribute to more vibrant rural economies? Researchers and policy makers have only just begun to consider these questions.

To fill this gap, the Future Agricultures Consortium is embarking on new research, outreach and engagement activities over the next three years that will explore how policies and institutions, including social protection measures, can support Africa’s rural youth to flourish, tapping into their energy, creativity and willingness to take risks and innovate in ways that bring about productive outcomes and improved livelihoods.

Jennifer Leavy
December 2009

 

FAC Communications Strategy

This twelve-month outreach plan aims to identify/distil key lessons and messages from FAC’s published and ongoing research and use communication channels or “pathways” to target specific agriculture policy stakeholders with these lessons and messages. The timing of outreach activities should coincide with agriculture policy windows (e.g. key conferences, when parliaments are in session, budget deliberations, government consultations on policy, media events, etc.).

Lessons from Malawi’s Fertiliser Subsidy Programme

By Blessings Chinsinga
February 2007 PB02 This case study argues that political context matters in agricultural development issues. No matter what the technical or economic arguments for or against particular policy positions are, it is ultimately the configuration of political interests that influence agricultural policy outcomes on the ground.

Key Consortium Outputs and Events: Phase I

  1. Soils and Fertilizers – December 2005
  2. Will Formalising Property Rights Reduce Poverty? – January 2006
  3. Millennium Villages – the solution to African poverty? – June 2006
  4. Aid modalities to agriculture – the end of the SWAp? – November 2006
  5. Growth linkages in agriculture: single blueprint or multiple trajectories? – Dec. 2006
  6. Seasonality: four seasons, four solutions? – April 2007
  7. Low External Input and Sustainable Agriculture: Beyond the Hype? – November 2007
  8. Can Ethiopia Realise a Better Agriculture in its ‘Third Millennium’? The Role and Dilemma of Farm Prices – October 2007
  9. An African Green Revolution? Some personal reflections – October 2007
  10. Global Assessments and the Politics of Knowledge: Lessons from the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology – April 2008

List of FAC outputs for 2008-09

By Andrew Dorward, Peter Hazell and Colin Poulton
March 2008

Agricultural input subsidies were a common element in agricultural development in poor rural economies in the 1960s and 70s, including successful green revolutions. Although subsidies have continued, to a greater and lesser extent, in some countries, conventional wisdom as well as dominant donor thinking in the 80s and 90s was that subsidies had been ineffective and inefficient policy instruments in Africa, which contributed to government overspending and fiscal and macroeconomic problems.

FAC Outputs for 2008/2009

Agricultural input subsidies were a common element in agricultural development in poor rural economies in the 1960s and 70s, including successful green revolutions. Although subsidies have continued, to a greater and lesser extent, in some countries, conventional wisdom as well as dominant donor thinking in the 80s and 90s was that subsidies had been ineffective and inefficient policy instruments in Africa, which contributed to government overspending and fiscal and macroeconomic problems.

Africa Forum’s CAADP Reader

Recognizing that agriculture is the mainstay of most African economies, NEPAD has taken the lead inhighlighting the critical role agriculture must play to reduce food insecurity and poverty. The Com- prehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) has been endorsed by African Headsof State and Governments as a vision for the restoration of agricultural growth, food security, andrural development in Africa in July 2003. Since then, CAADP is the AU/NEPAD framework for devel- opment of the agriculture sector in Africa1. A specific goal of CAADP is to attain an average annualgrowth rate of 6% in agriculture. To achieve this goal, CAADP aims to stimulate agriculture-led de- velopment that eliminates hunger and reduces poverty and food insecurity. More specifically, theNEPAD vision for Africa holds that, by 2015, Africa should:

 

Nairobi hosts food security meeting

The lessons and ideas are to be used as an input into country-driven development of the agricultural and rural sector, he said.

The five day forum is under the theme The Bottom of the Pyramid: Agricultural Development for the Vulnerable.

“In spite of the positive socio-economic and political gains that have been recorded in the past 10 years, Africa remains a troubled continent. This is a continent where famine and diseases are widespread. A continent where 200 million people are undernourished and 33 million children are malnourished and go to sleep hungry every night,” Mr. Mkandawire said.

He warned that in absence of some real tangible emergency and long term measures-food prices are set to remain high for most African countries over the next couple of years.

The AU and NEPAD have been advocating for African agricultural capacity building, so that African countries can better develop their agricultural capacities.

Endorsed by the AU in 2003, CAADP is an Africa-led and Africa-owned NEPAD initiative and framework to rationalise and revitalise African agriculture for economic growth and lasting poverty reduction results.

“In this light, may I state that the African Union and NEPAD will play a lead role in ensuring that the knowledge generation centres, through the Regional Economic Communities, work very closely with the countries in enhancing and strengthening the national round table processes and we shall endeavour to mobilise the relevant resources to support this process,” Mr. Mkandawire said.

While opening the conference on Monday at Laico Regency Hotel, Agriculture minister William Ruto said five children were dying of hunger every five seconds worldwide.

“Globally, we have one billion hungry people, meaning one-sixth of all humanity is hungry and malnourished.

“This figure represents over 100 million more hungry people than in 2008 and out of these, five children die every 30 seconds. Beyond the numbers, this means horrible suffering for children, women, men, relatives, friends or neighbours. This is mankind’s tragic achievement in these modern days when our technology allows us to travel to the moon and to space stations,” the minister said.

In Africa, Mr Ruto said, 218 million people or 30 percent of population were suffering from chronic hunger and malnutrition.

*This article first appeared on The Nation Website http://www.nation.co.ke/ on December 2, 2009. Mr. Lucas Barasa is an active member of the CAADP Network of Journalists.

Best wishes,
CAADP Team

Nairobi hosts food security meeting

grain_handsBy Lucas Barasa*

Nairobi, 2nd December 2009 – A major conference to help enhance food security in Africa and share lessons on best practices entered its third day in Nairobi Wednesday.

The Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP) head Richard Mkandawire who spoke on behalf of the African Union Commission and New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) said the forum is a platform for sharing experiences and lessons from each other’s best practices in agriculture. <

The lessons and ideas are to be used as an input into country-driven development of the agricultural and rural sector, he said.

The five day forum is under the theme The Bottom of the Pyramid: Agricultural Development for the Vulnerable.

“In spite of the positive socio-economic and political gains that have been recorded in the past 10 years, Africa remains a troubled continent. This is a continent where famine and diseases are widespread. A continent where 200 million people are undernourished and 33 million children are malnourished and go to sleep hungry every night,” Mr. Mkandawire said.

He warned that in absence of some real tangible emergency and long term measures-food prices are set to remain high for most African countries over the next couple of years.

The AU and NEPAD have been advocating for African agricultural capacity building, so that African countries can better develop their agricultural capacities.

Endorsed by the AU in 2003, CAADP is an Africa-led and Africa-owned NEPAD initiative and framework to rationalise and revitalise African agriculture for economic growth and lasting poverty reduction results.

“In this light, may I state that the African Union and NEPAD will play a lead role in ensuring that the knowledge generation centres, through the Regional Economic Communities, work very closely with the countries in enhancing and strengthening the national round table processes and we shall endeavour to mobilise the relevant resources to support this process,” Mr. Mkandawire said.

While opening the conference on Monday at Laico Regency Hotel, Agriculture minister William Ruto said five children were dying of hunger every five seconds worldwide.

“Globally, we have one billion hungry people, meaning one-sixth of all humanity is hungry and malnourished.

“This figure represents over 100 million more hungry people than in 2008 and out of these, five children die every 30 seconds. Beyond the numbers, this means horrible suffering for children, women, men, relatives, friends or neighbours. This is mankind’s tragic achievement in these modern days when our technology allows us to travel to the moon and to space stations,” the minister said.

In Africa, Mr Ruto said, 218 million people or 30 percent of population were suffering from chronic hunger and malnutrition.

*This article first appeared on The Nation Website http://www.nation.co.ke/ on December 2, 2009. Mr. Lucas Barasa is an active member of the CAADP Network of Journalists.

Best wishes,
CAADP Team {jathumbnail off}

Nairobi hosts food security meeting

grain_handsBy Lucas Barasa*

Nairobi, 2nd December 2009 – A major conference to help enhance food security in Africa and share lessons on best practices entered its third day in Nairobi Wednesday.

The Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP) head Richard Mkandawire who spoke on behalf of the African Union Commission and New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) said the forum is a platform for sharing experiences and lessons from each other’s best practices in agriculture. <

The lessons and ideas are to be used as an input into country-driven development of the agricultural and rural sector, he said.

The five day forum is under the theme The Bottom of the Pyramid: Agricultural Development for the Vulnerable.

“In spite of the positive socio-economic and political gains that have been recorded in the past 10 years, Africa remains a troubled continent. This is a continent where famine and diseases are widespread. A continent where 200 million people are undernourished and 33 million children are malnourished and go to sleep hungry every night,” Mr. Mkandawire said.

He warned that in absence of some real tangible emergency and long term measures-food prices are set to remain high for most African countries over the next couple of years.

The AU and NEPAD have been advocating for African agricultural capacity building, so that African countries can better develop their agricultural capacities.

Endorsed by the AU in 2003, CAADP is an Africa-led and Africa-owned NEPAD initiative and framework to rationalise and revitalise African agriculture for economic growth and lasting poverty reduction results.

“In this light, may I state that the African Union and NEPAD will play a lead role in ensuring that the knowledge generation centres, through the Regional Economic Communities, work very closely with the countries in enhancing and strengthening the national round table processes and we shall endeavour to mobilise the relevant resources to support this process,” Mr. Mkandawire said.

While opening the conference on Monday at Laico Regency Hotel, Agriculture minister William Ruto said five children were dying of hunger every five seconds worldwide.

“Globally, we have one billion hungry people, meaning one-sixth of all humanity is hungry and malnourished.

“This figure represents over 100 million more hungry people than in 2008 and out of these, five children die every 30 seconds. Beyond the numbers, this means horrible suffering for children, women, men, relatives, friends or neighbours. This is mankind’s tragic achievement in these modern days when our technology allows us to travel to the moon and to space stations,” the minister said.

In Africa, Mr Ruto said, 218 million people or 30 percent of population were suffering from chronic hunger and malnutrition.

*This article first appeared on The Nation Website http://www.nation.co.ke/ on December 2, 2009. Mr. Lucas Barasa is an active member of the CAADP Network of Journalists.

Best wishes,
CAADP Team {jathumbnail off}

2009 CAADP Africa Forum

The forum opened with addresses from Kenya’s Minister of Agriculture, Hon. William Ruto and Kenya’s Permanent Secretary for agriculture, Hon. Romano Kiome who outlined five priorities for Kenya agriculture, largely focused on improving access and all requiring leadership, efficiency, and good governance; they are:

  • inputs
  • credit
  • markets
  • irrigation
  • institutions

As the day continued, delegates had questions about the ongoing planning phase of CAADP and its added-value to national agriculture policies. As well, delegates discussed if CAADP could provide assistance at the national level and what are the windows of opportunity within CAADP for effective cooperation with the state, existing poverty strategy plans and initiatives with donors. {jathumbnail off}

2009 CAADP Africa Forum

The Bottom of the Pyramid: Agriculture Development for the Vulnerable.

conferenceOn November 30 in Nairobi, more than 160 delegates from across Africa met for the fourth CAADP Africa Forum, organized by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) from 30 November-4 December 2009. The Forum’s theme is ‘The Bottom of the Pyramid: Agricultural Development for the Vulnerable’.

The forum opened with addresses from Kenya’s Minister of Agriculture, Hon. William Ruto and Kenya’s Permanent Secretary for agriculture, Hon. Romano Kiome who outlined five priorities for Kenya agriculture, largely focused on improving access and all requiring leadership, efficiency, and good governance; they are:

  • inputs
  • credit
  • markets
  • irrigation
  • institutions

As the day continued, delegates had questions about the ongoing planning phase of CAADP and its added-value to national agriculture policies. As well, delegates discussed if CAADP could provide assistance at the national level and what are the windows of opportunity within CAADP for effective cooperation with the state, existing poverty strategy plans and initiatives with donors. {jathumbnail off}

2009 CAADP Africa Forum

The Bottom of the Pyramid: Agriculture Development for the Vulnerable.

conferenceOn November 30 in Nairobi, more than 160 delegates from across Africa met for the fourth CAADP Africa Forum, organized by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) from 30 November-4 December 2009. The Forum’s theme is ‘The Bottom of the Pyramid: Agricultural Development for the Vulnerable’.

The forum opened with addresses from Kenya’s Minister of Agriculture, Hon. William Ruto and Kenya’s Permanent Secretary for agriculture, Hon. Romano Kiome who outlined five priorities for Kenya agriculture, largely focused on improving access and all requiring leadership, efficiency, and good governance; they are:

  • inputs
  • credit
  • markets
  • irrigation
  • institutions

As the day continued, delegates had questions about the ongoing planning phase of CAADP and its added-value to national agriculture policies. As well, delegates discussed if CAADP could provide assistance at the national level and what are the windows of opportunity within CAADP for effective cooperation with the state, existing poverty strategy plans and initiatives with donors. {jathumbnail off}

CAADP Africa Forum

2A major conference to help enhance food security in Africa and share lessons on best practices took place in Nairobi from 28 – 30 November 2009.

The Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Programme (CAADP) head Richard Mkandawire who spoke on behalf of the African Union Commission and New Partnership for African Development (NEPAD) said the forum is a platform for sharing experiences and lessons from each other’s best practices in agriculture.

The lessons and ideas are to be used as an input into country-driven development of the agricultural and rural sector, he said.

The five day forum is under the theme The Bottom of the Pyramid: Agricultural Development for the Vulnerable.

“In spite of the positive socio-economic and political gains that have been recorded in the past 10 years, Africa remains a troubled continent. This is a continent where famine and diseases are widespread. A continent where 200 million people are undernourished and 33 million children are malnourished and go to sleep hungry every night,” Mr. Mkandawire said.

He warned that in absence of some real tangible emergency and long term measures-food prices are set to remain high for most African countries over the next couple of years.

The AU and NEPAD have been advocating for African agricultural capacity building, so that African countries can better develop their agricultural capacities.

Endorsed by the AU in 2003, CAADP is an Africa-led and Africa-owned NEPAD initiative and framework to rationalise and revitalise African agriculture for economic growth and lasting poverty reduction results.

“In this light, may I state that the African Union and NEPAD will play a lead role in ensuring that the knowledge generation centres, through the Regional Economic Communities, work very closely with the countries in enhancing and strengthening the national round table processes and we shall endeavour to mobilise the relevant resources to support this process,” Mr. Mkandawire said.

While opening the conference on Monday at Laico Regency Hotel, Agriculture Minister William Ruto said five children were dying of hunger every five seconds worldwide.

“Globally, we have one billion hungry people, meaning one-sixth of all humanity is hungry and malnourished. This figure represents over 100 million more hungry people than in 2008 and out of these, five children die every 30 seconds. Beyond the numbers, this means horrible suffering for children, women, men, relatives, friends or neighbours. This is mankind’s tragic achievement in these modern days when our technology allows us to travel to the moon and to space stations,” the minister said.

In Africa, Mr Ruto said, 218 million people or 30 percent of population were suffering from chronic hunger and malnutrition.

*This article first appeared on The Nation Website http://www.nation.co.ke/ on December 2, 2009. Mr. Lucas Barasa is an active member of the CAADP Network of Journalists.

By Lucas Barasa

E-debate: Pastoralism in Crisis?

Man_goat

Drought in the Horn of Africa – again. With the region’s worst drought in over a decade, pastoral households around the Ethiopian, Kenyan and Somali borders have been hard hit. Alongside the humanitarian response, a re-emerging debate on the future of pastoral systems is taking shape. Is the proverbial grass greener on one side than the other?

The revival of interest in pastoralism and livestock production takes two forms – one a celebration of the ‘pastoral way of life’ and the importance of indigenous systems of production and management and another focusing on the market potentials of a ‘livestock revolution’.

The Future Agricultures Consortium recognises the importance of these debates in shaping the future of pastoral production systems and livelihoods in East Africa. In order to raise the profile of this important discussion, we present (below) one side of the debate –a pessimistic thesis by Stephen Sandford, and challenge this with a more upbeat thesis from Stephen Devereaux and Ian Scoones of Future Agricultures.

FAC e-debate: Pastoralism in Crisis?

Rights Talk and Rights Practice: Challenges for Southern Africa

“Rights-based approaches” are increasingly seen as a core component of development by donors, NGOs and governments alike (see, for example, Häussermann 1998, Maxwell 1999). With clearly specified, legally-enshrined and universal rights, it is argued, citizens can voice their demands on the basis of clear, transparent legal provision, sometimes with constitutional backing. With the law providing the basis for negotiation, parties are accountable and decisions are clear. More generally, particularly with a constitutionally enshrined framework, there is a basic political signal that rights matter, and that people should organise and claim rights through accountable political and legal processes. Such a vision is therefore very much in line with the liberal, democratic form of governance being promoted by development agencies around the world. For livelihoods potentially the broad range of human rights, political, economic and social, matter. But the key question, and one the Sustainable Livelihoods in Southern Africa programme has focused on, is how can these be made real for poor people in rural areas?

Challenges for Rural Development in South Africa

Livelihoods in southern Africa are in crisis. One of the worst ever food crises has hit the region, with over 14 million reported to be at risk. Newspapers carry appeals from charities for support, and TV images of food queues and malnourished children are commonplace. Yet, southern Africa is the region where the development success story was supposed to unfold. This was the bread basket of the continent, where economic reforms were apparently generating growth and investment and where the great hopes of democratic transition were supposed to show quick dividends. According to the script, the crisis was not supposed to happen.

The research on which this Bulletin is based has attempted to examine how various rural development and governance initiatives, concerning wild resources, land and water, have played out in practice in a series of rural areas in three southern African countries: Mozambique, South Africa and Zimbabwe. By looking empirically and in detail at what has and has not happened on the ground, questions are raised about the nature of the current livelihoods crisis, its origins and potential solutions. What emerges, perhaps not surprisingly, is a complex story connecting livelihood change with the dynamics of politics and power, where easy technical or managerial solutions are not immediately evident.

Commercialisations in Agriculture

Jennifer Leavy and Colin Poulton
September 2007

According to this thinking, smallholder agriculture is uniquely positioned to deliver broad-based growth in rural areas (where the vast majority of the world?s poor still live). However, others fear that strategies for commercialising agriculture will not bring benefits to the majority of rural households, either directly or (in the view of some) at all. Instead, they fear that efforts to promote a more commercial agriculture will benefit primarily large-scale farms. At best, the top minority of smallholders will be able to benefit.

Accelerated growth in agriculture is seen by many as critical if the MDGs are to be met in Africa. Although there are debates about the future viability of small farms (Hazell et al. 2007), the official policies of many national governments and international development agencies accord a central role to the intensification and commercialisation of smallholder agriculture as a means of achieving poverty reduction.

Social Protection for Agricultural Growth

Various explanations have been advanced for the persistent under?performance of agriculturein many African countries, where smallholder farming is still the dominant livelihood activityand the main source of employment, food and income. Some of the oldest argumentsremain the most compelling. African farmers face harsh agro?ecologies and erratic weather,characterised by low soil fertility, recurrent droughts and/or floods, and increasinglyunpredictable weather patterns associated with climate change. Vulnerability to shocks iscompounded by infrastructure deficits (roads and transport networks, telecommunications,potable water and irrigation) that keep poor communities poor and vulnerable, as testifiedby the phenomenon observed during livelihood crises of steep food price gradients fromisolated rural villages to densely settled urban centres. African farmers have also beeninadequately protected against the forces of globalisation and adverse international terms oftrade – for instance, Western farmers and markets are heavily protected in ways that Africanfarmers and markets are not.

Seasonality and Social Protection in Africa

Stephen Devereux
January 2009

This Working Paper draws on nearly twenty years of research in several African countries on the inter-related themes of food insecurity, seasonality, coping strategies, famine, formal and informal safety nets and social protection. The paper has three objectives:

  1. To document and synthesise evidence on the nature and consequences of seasonality across rural Africa, highlighting the similarities and convergences across contexts
  2. To explore the various policy interventions that have been implemented in response to seasonality, with particular reference to the emerging social protection agenda
  3. To argue that current approaches to social protection are misconceived and inadequate for addressing the seasonal dimensions of rural vulnerability

Establishment Of Kenya National Agricultural Innovation Systems

Studies on systems of agricultural innovation in Kenya and other African countries have shown that the concept of innovation exists in form of technologies, products, processes and organizational forms. Notable also is the existence of indigenous systems of innovation which have not been considered in development of modern innovations. In other instances, this concept of innovation has not been operationally explored in terms of its capacity to improve agricultural productivity which would culminate into a food secure nation and economically empowered farmers. Despite the existence of various organizations dealing with systems of innovation, there are weak linkages between them and more so, along the commodity value chains.

Land, Land Policy and Smallholder Agriculture in Ethiopia

By Samuel Gebreselassie

Land is a public property in Ethiopia. It has been administered by the government since the 1975 radical land reform. The reform brought to an end the exploitative type of relationship that existed between tenants and landlords. Tenants became own operators with use rights, but with no rights to sell, mortgage or exchange of land. The change of government in 1991 has brought not much change in terms of land policy. The EPRDF-led government that overthrew the Military government (Derg) in 1991 has inherited the land policy of its predecessor. Even though the new government adopted a free market economic policy, it has decided to maintain all rural and urban land under public ownership. The December 1994 Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia proclaimed that ‘Land is a common property of the nations, nationalities and peoples of Ethiopia and shall not be subject to sale or to other means of transfer’. Since the 1975 land reform, which made all rural land public property, the possession of land plots has been conditional upon residence in a village. The transfer of land through long-term lease or sales has been forbidden1, and government sponsored periodic redistribution, though, discouraged administratively since the early 1990s, has not been outlawed (Mulat, 1999).

Using Social Protection Policies to Reduce Vulnerability and Promote Economic Growth in Kenya

By John Omiti and Timothy Nyanamba
August 2007

Vulnerability and human suffering are major challenges facing large sections of Kenyan society who depend on agriculture for their livelihoods. Policy reforms have failed to adequately address social protection issues afflicting particularly the most vulnerable groups. This paper discusses ways in which social protection policies can be used to address the key sources or aspects of this vulnerability, and to promote agricultural and economic growth. The paper reviews social protection instruments, maps out actors involved in the provision of social protection, assesses the progress in provision of social protection in Kenya and identifies issues in moving forward to improve social protection, particularly in the agriculture sector.

Synthesis Report for Theme III: Growth and Social Protection June 2005–September 2007

By Rachel Sabates-Wheeler, Andrew Dorward, John Omiti, Stephen Devereux, Amdissa Teshome, Ephraim Chirwa
October 2007

This report describes the main activities and outputs of the Future Agriculture Consortium (FAC) under the theme of Growth and Social Protection for Phase I. Core work on the theme has involved the development of a conceptual framework setting out potential and evolving synergies and conflicts between social protection and agricultural growth in the livelihoods of poor and vulnerable people, in local and national economies, and in policy formulation and implementation. Publication and discussion of the framework has led to its uptake outside the FAC and in the country theme work. In Ethiopia and Malawi this has engaged strongly with evaluations and national and donor policy reviews of innovative and major national social protection and/or agricultural growth policies.

Such engagement has, necessarily, followed the national rather than FAC timetable, and hence theme work in these two countries has not reached the planned September completion; this is a price worth paying for the opportunities to learn from and contribute to these major national programmes, which have continent-wide relevance. In Kenya, theme work has explored, with national stakeholders, the multiple and often uncoordinated social protection interventions of different players, as well as their actual and potential interactions with agricultural development. This work has generated considerable interest and provides a platform for rethinking and improving policies and interventions.

Work on this theme has achieved considerable leverage through its integration with non-FAC work being conducted by FAC-members and by stimulating interest in the theme by other players. There are also strong cross-theme linkages through work on the policy processes of social protection and agricultural policy development, and through recognition of the importance of labour markets and on- and off-farm diversification in social protection / agriculture livelihood linkages.

Further work in the remainder of Phase I will involve writing up and reporting the work in Ethiopia and Malawi, and synthesis of this with other work being conducted by consortium members, with particular emphasis on cross-country lesson-learning.

Making science and technology work for the poor

By Ian Scoones

In this viewpoint piece I want to argue that, as currently organised, R and D systems – both public and private – don’t necessarily respond well to the needs of poor people in developing countries. Despite all the hype about the potentials of science and technology for reducing poverty, there are many missed opportunities. Very often poor and marginalised people across the global south do not end up benefiting from S and T. How then should we rethink R and D so that S and T can help in the important challenge to ‘make poverty history’?

Soil Fertility – Contributions

Everyone is agreed that one of the central components of achieving an „African Green Revolution? is to tackle the widespread soil fertility constraints in African agriculture. To this end, AGRA – the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa – has launched a major new „Soil Health? programme aimed at 4.1 million farmers across Africa, with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation committing $198 million.

e-Debate-Contributions-Soil Fertility-Oct 08

Atlest in the semi-arid regions of Africa,if within-field soil variability is not taken into account,efforts to increase soil fertility will be less efficient and less likely to be adopted by farmers. Most of these farmers already practice precision agriculture and take short distance variability into consideration in their management.

Failing Farmer radio transcript

Presenter: Nik Gowing

Guests: Dr Makanjuola Olaseinde Arigbede; Andrew Bennett; Kevin Cleaver; Crawford Falconer; Professor LouiseFresco; Anthony Gooch; Duncan Green; Simeon Greene; The Honourable Kate Kainja Kaluluma; Paul Nicholson;Esther Penunia; Professor Norah Olembo; Peter Robbins; Dr. Pedro Sanchez

NIK GOWING: in the rich countries and the poorer countries, in the developed world and the developing world, in the north and the south smallholder farmers are leaving the land. Our food is increasingly being produced by big business. As long as there is food for you and me to buy does it matter? A growing body of expert opinions says yes it does.Studies show that in poorer countries the tens of millions of small farms are a win win for economic growth and poverty reduction. They are more efficient than large farms. They keep large numbers of people in paid productive work and they ensure secure supplies of food. So if small farms are so important why is their very existence under threat? Why should we care about failing the farmer?

Well we’ve brought together an international panel of farmers’ representatives, from government, from tradebodies, scientists, business, non governmental organisations and donor agencies to discuss whether we are failing the farmer. Let’s hear from three smallholder farmers for whom farming is their way of life that’s under threat. Paul Nicholson, you’re a farmer from the Basque region in Northern Spain, you speak for the international peasant movement which is La Via Campesina. Why should we be caring about the small farmer? Small farmers produce the majority of all the food we consume wherever we are in this world.

BBC World Debate: Failing the Farmer?

By Presenter Nik Gowing

Small farmers produce the majority of all the food we consume wherever we are in this world – but in the rich countries and the poorer countries, in the developed world and the developing world, in the north and the south smallholder farmers are leaving the land. Our food is increasingly being produced by big business. As long as there is food for you and me to buy does it matter? A growing body of expert opinions says yes it does.

David Bonbright

If you think in terms of systems, or if you live long enough, you come to the view that structural incentives are very very important in shaping outcomes. Other factors — like capacity, supply drivers, and values — matter too, of course. But if these swim against the current of structural incentives, they will eventually be swept out to sea!

So I ask myself how we might create structural incentives to promote Smallholder Farmer Voice. Here is one answer that bears consideration. I call it the Feedback Principle:

Credible public and donor reporting by an organization intending agriculture-related outcomes includes not only the logic and evidence for the outcomes, but also

(1) what smallholder farmers say about what the organization says it have achieved; and

(2) how the organization proposes to respond to farmer feedback.

There are a host of important, absorbing-to-solve questions about howorganizations should prepare for and do high quality constituency-validated reporting in a way that is meaningful and not tokenistic. But the main point on the how to challenges is that given a transparency-based incentive to do it along the lines of the one created by the Feedback Principle, organizations will figure out how to do it, and do it well. Our work at Keystone has taught us that if you are serious about making farmers’ voices heard, then you must ensure that their voices are fundamental to assessment and reporting. And to make farmers’ voices fundamental to assessment and reporting, you have to involve them in defining goals in the first place, and in how we will know success when we see it. While we have found that there are no shortcuts to progress here, there are some simple solutions that are easy to implement and don’t add to the ‘consultation burden’ that farmers already bear. If there is interest, I can say more about these ways and means.

Goran Forssen

Being a representative of Farmers Organisations (FOs) in Southern Africa, I find the topic “Making the farmers voice heard” both interesting and challenging. My opinion is that the strengthening of the farmers’ voice is absolute necessary and fundamental for the achievement of agriculture development and a green revolution in Africa. It was therefore most encouraging that almost all working groups in the “Towards an African Green Revolution Conference and Seminar” made recommendations on the need for strengthening of the capacity of FOs.

A number of good recommendations were presented by the different working groups in the conference/ seminar. However, I believe that the role that FOs should play in making the farmers’ voices heard did not come out clearly in the discussions. I have therefore made an attempt in this submission to outline some of the key-roles that are important for FOs to perform in order to create a better understanding for the support that they are in need of. I have focused my discussion on two key areas which are both crucial for strengthening of the voice of farmers. The first area focuses on the role FOs should play in order to influence agricultural policies and programmes. The second area focus on the role FOs should play in order to achieve a more equal power balance between smallholder farmers and agribusinesses. I have finally made an attempt to discuss: What should be done to enable FOs to play their roles?

What role should FOs play to increase smallholder farmers’ influence on agricultural policies and programmes?
Smallholder farmers’ influence on agricultural policies and programmes is generally week. Most organizations representing smallholder farmers lack or has limited capacity to effectively engage in different policy formulation processes. Because of their limited capacity, FO’s have had a tendency to be more reactive than proactive in the policy formulation process and have often entered the process at a late stage when it is difficult to influence the decisions. As a result, they have had little influence on agricultural policies.

To become more influential, there is need to strengthen the capacity of National Farmers Unions to:
a) Identify the critical policy issues and to develop their own policy agenda.
b) Analyse the issues through farmer lead policy research.
c) Formulate policy proposals/ positions through consultative processes with their members. This is important in order to create ownership of the policy positions and to enable their representatives to lobby for their positions with strength.
d) Engage in effective advocacy and lobbying with the decision makers. This includes formation of networks and alliances for their positions/ proposals, development of effective lobby strategies, etc.
e) Communicate their positions, objectives and achievements with their members, stake holders and general public.

What role should FOs play strengthen smallholder farmers marketing powers?
Smallholder farmers’ power balance with agribusinesses is also generally weak. Studies have shown that the power balance between farmers and agribusinesses is heavily tilted in favour of the agribusinesses. Unequal power balance has resulted in smallholder farmers not being able to get a fair price for their products in relation to other actors in the value chain.

To achieve more equal partnerships that enable mutual growth and fair deals between smallholder farmers and agribusinesses, there is need to develop and strengthen the capacity of Commodity Organisations and national Farmers Unions to:
a) Provide information to their members about marketing opportunities, producer prices, etc. and to link up farmers with agribusinesses willing to buy their products,
b) Analyse value chains, and develop marketing strategies and member services that are relevant to the members needs.
c) Engage in collective negotiations with agribusinesses about contracts in contract farming arrangements
d) Monitor implementation of contract arrangements,
e) Provide advisory service and farmers’ skills development on production techniques, standards, marketing, etc.,
f) Develop, promote and organise appropriate bulk input and output marketing systems for members including auctioning, warehouse receipt systems, brokerage, etc.
g) Promote establishment of appropriate agribusinesses such as farmers’ cooperatives,

What should be done to enable FOs to play their roles?
To perform the above roles, national FOs will be in need of training, advisory service and technical backstopping support. Such support could be provided for by various specialised organisations in different subject matters. E.g. policy research institutions could be assigned by FOs to carry out policy analysis. Other institutions could carry out training on lobby and advocacy, etc. This type of technical support could be coordinated by the Regional FOs. E.g. SACAU is already providing and coordinating capacity building support to its member organisations (National Farmers Unions) in Southern Africa. However, the ability to provide such services will depend on the availability of financial resources.

Simultaneously, the national FOs themselves will be in need of financial resources to perform their activities. This includes to employing specialists; to pay for office space and equipment; and to pay costs for implementation of different activities.

A common problem is that most FOs representing smallholder farmers are unable to generate such financial resources from their members. The main reason is that the farmers they represent are poor and the FOs has to put their membership fees at such low levels that are affordable to the poor farmers but not sustainable for their organisations.

For most smallholders FOs, the main source of income has been financial support from various development and donor agencies. Such support has mainly enabled FOs to maintain core functions of their organisations. Few organisations have received financial support that has enabled them to significantly strengthen the voice of the smallholder farmers.

Although desirable, it is not realistic to believe that national FOs, in particular Farmers Unions representing smallholder farmers, will be in a position, at least in the short to medium term, to generate adequate funds from their members. They will remain in need of financial support from development and donor agencies. It will therefore be important that those agencies not only maintain their support but significantly increase their support to FOs.

To make donor support more efficient, there is need for increased donor coordination and a shift from project to programme support along the lines of the Paris declaration. Such programmes should be planned for by the FOs themselves and should outline the role they should play, backstopping support that they would be in need of, capacities that they would require and gaps that needs to be filled, with focus on achieving agriculture development in Africa. An important part in their planning should be to address gender issues, and specific interests expressed by women and poor farmers.

National programmes could be integrated into regional programmes and support to the national FOs could be channelled through the regional FOs. The idea of the establishment of an African-wide, farmer-owned and farmer-driven fund for directing research, innovation and technology development toward farmers needs, should be broadened and should include institutional capacity building of national and regional FOs to perform services that enables the achievement of a uniquely Green Revolution in Africa.

African Green Revolution

maize_smallholderTowards a “Green Revolution” for Africa How can Africa’s farmers, scientists, development practitioners, private entrepreneurs and public officials spark a “uniquely” Green Revolution in Africa, one that responds to the region’s unique social, political and ecological conditions?

The aim of this moderated e-Discussion is to focus the discussions on action-oriented approaches to address the “how” part of the African Green Revolution discussions. The Salzburg Global Seminar (SGS), in partnership with the Future Agricultures Consortium (FAC) and the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), has undertaken a series of events on the theme of an “African Green Revolution”. The main purpose of these initiatives is to assess the most critical issues and to review, refine and articulate an agenda for a new sustainable “Green Revolution” for Sub-Saharan Africa. The Salzburg report represents a summary of the week-long deliberations, highlights key points of agreement and divergence, and sets out a number of recommendations for follow-up and future action.In light of the considerable interest generated by the conference and seminar, SGS, FAC, and IDS are creating a space for people to contribute to and extend this important discussion. The three broad discussion themes were considered sequentially. Participants are asked to address this question under the following three themes and to highlight the best actions that can be taken to address these issues:

  1. Making Farmers’ Voices Heard October 13th – October 24th

Inclusion is seen as crucial to the new agenda for African agriculture. Governments, donors, farmer organisations and NGOs, must consider the particular issues surrounding small-scale farmer and issues of equity. An equitable Green Revolution requires an increased ability to facilitate inclusive approaches in which farmers, especially the small-holder, women and the poor, can access training develop new knowledge and skills in organisational leadership, business management, innovation processes, policy engagement and advocacy, and performance monitoring and learning. Contributions on this theme should revolve around concrete actions – indicating who the key actors are – to address the following questions: Which of the recommendations set forth best achieve the goal of amplifying farmers’ voices in policy debates and decision-making processes? How can we ensure that measurable targets are set for gender and equity? How can we build capacity of grassroots organisations for basic skills (e.g., organisations and business skills) and leadership (to influence policy and negotiations)? How do we strengthen horizontal and vertical linkages and partnerships/networks with other organisations? And how can we increase access to resources and services for small-scale farmers and marginalized groups?

  1. Making Science and Technology Work for Small-scale Farmers October 27 – November 7th

The role of appropriate science and technology that meets the need of the small-scale farmers was identified as a crucial component for an equitable and sustainable Green Revolution for Africa. Making science and technology work for the poor calls for a multiplicity of approaches to establish links to diversity and complexity, across a range of different environments and systems throughout the continent. This requires an urgent push for major investments and key inputs now – such as improved seeds, organic and inorganic fertilisers, and soil and water management – to address nutrient deficiencies and boost productivity. Contributions to this theme should revolve around concrete actions to address the following questions: Which of the recommendations and what specific actions should be pursued to ensure that appropriate technologies are developed to assist small-scale farmers and establish inclusive processes that engage farmers throughout? What policy measures and incentives are needed to influence the governance of both public and private sector R&D systems to make them more responsive to the needs and priorities of small-scale farmers?

  1. Partnerships and CoherenceNovember 10th – November 21st

There has been much debate about the importance of coordination and alignment of initiatives and institutions. It is recognized that there are many actors involved in the “Green Revolution” and that the challenge lays in linking up various agendas to make sure we are moving in the right direction and not working at cross purposes. Contributions on this theme should focus on concrete actions to address the following questions: Which of the recommendations and proposed actions will enable coherence and encourage strategic partnerships and alignment? What are the best methods to coordinate actions among the key process and initiatives, such as CAADP, AGRA, and other public and private efforts? How can we ensure that the policy processes enhance the compact and roundtable processes of these initiatives and ensure that policy stability, transparency and coherence are created at national and international levels? What are the best methods to ensure bottom-up (i.e. locally driven) initiatives are incorporated into these alliances?

Moderator

Ms. Nalan Yuksel (IDS, University of Sussex), who was one of the lead authors for the UN Millennium Project’s Task Force on Hunger Report and author of “Achieving a Uniquely African Green Revolution” the final report of the Salzburg Global Seminar, will moderate the E-Forum discussion.

The moderator reserves the right to edit contributions on the basis of relevance/focus and language, but not in relation to content, view or opinion (see Principles of Engagement). Contributions will be posted several times per week. At the end of topic discussion, submissions will be drawn together in a short summary, with the moderator highlighting any new points for further discussion. At the end of the process the moderator will synthesise the contributions into a short document which will be sent to all participants.

JacobVanEtten

Postdoctoral fellow, International Rice Research Institute (2008-2009)
Assistant professor, School of Biology, IE University(2009-)

Tansey IDSseedsJul09

  • Biological – ecological
  • History – global restructuring
  • Human needs – multi-dimensional
    – physiological
    – social
    – cultural

FAC Meetings Autumn07

Early in the new century a consensus on agricultural and rural development emerged that provided renewed impetus to efforts to boost both agricultural development and the rural non-farm economy, in a context of ever closer rural-urban linkages and globalisation. Both governments and donors have committed themselves to support this.

The challenge has been to translate themes into practical policy. For two years the Future Agricultures Consortium, supported by DFID, has been investigating how to do this, primarily in Ethiopia, Kenya and Malawi.

This set of meetings presents of the results of this work. It also includes the World Bank presenting the 2008 World Development Report on Agriculture and Development, and two sessions on the way forward and whether or not emerging challenges from biofuels, climate change, and the growth of China and India imply that the agenda needs radical revision.

FAC Mid Term Review

NOVEMBER 2007
Consultants: Frank Ellis and Godfrey Bahiigwa

The findings are based on written and timeline evidence provided to the reviewers by the consortium, including the complete published output of its current phase, and 17 telephone interviews with FAC members and independent commentators.

Farmer First Revisited

•Different types of farmers from 20 ya – new economic and livelihood contexts

•Global and regional differences

•Shocks and stresses – climate change, HIV/AIDS, commodity prices, urbanisation/demand

The Crisis Of Pastoralism

As part of discussions on the future of pastoral production systems in East Africa there have been a number of recent interventions arguing that something urgently needs to be done to deal with a Malthusian style crisis in pastoral areas. In short, the argument goes, there are too many people which, combined with a declining (or not increasing) productivity of the natural resource base, means that not enough livestock can be kept to sustain a viable pastoral system. This argument has been most eloquently and effectively argued by Stephen Sandford in “Too many people, too few livestock: the crisis affecting pastoralists in the Greater Horn of Africa”. This is a response to this piece, aimed at sparking a wider discussion.

 

The Social Protection Policy in Malawi: Processes Politics and Challenges

Blessings Chinsinga
September 2007

This paper is based on a study undertaken to critically understand the dynamics of policy-making and processes under the auspices of the Future Agricultures Consortium’s (FAC) sub-theme on politics and policy processes hosted by the Institute of Development Studies (IDS) in the United Kingdom. FAC’s operative philosophy is that contrary to the traditional and highly stylized perspective, policy-making does not happen in neat distinct stages except perhaps in the minimal sense that policies are proposed, legislated and implemented. Policy processes are thus a complex mesh of interactions and ramifications between a wide range of stakeholders driven, and constrained by the contexts in which they operate (cf. IDS, 2006; Oya, 2006). Understanding the policy processes therefore requires:

  1. Grasping the narratives that tell the policy stories
  2. The way positions become embedded in networks of various actors
  3. The enabling or constraining power dynamics (politics and interests)

BBC World Debate: Failing the Farmer?

Small farmers produce the majority of all the food we consume wherever we are in this world Butin the rich countries and the poorer countries, in the developed world and the developing world, in the north and the south smallholder farmers are leaving the land. Our food is increasingly being produced by big business. As long as there is food for you and me to buy does it matter? A growing body of expert opinions says yes it does.

Studies show that in poorer countries the tens of millions of small farms are a win win for economic growth and poverty reduction. They are more efficient than large farms. They keep large numbers of people in paidproductive work and they ensure secure supplies of food. So if small farms are so important why is their very existence under threat? Why should we care about failing the farmer? Well we’ve brought together an international panel of farmers representatives, from government, from tradebodies, scientists, business, non governmental organisations and donor agencies to discuss whether we are failing the farmer.

Let’s hear from three smallholder farmers for whom farming is their way of life that’s under threat.Paul Nicholson, you’re a farmer from the Basque region in Northern Spain, you speak for the international peasant movement which is La Via Campesina. Why should we be caring about the small farmer?

First of all more than half of the world’s population are farmers, peasants or fisher folk. And we are the mainstay of local economy. We maintain not only local economy but the local cultures, the bio diversity.We are the stewards of nature in that sense, we maintain er a clear water.

And the crisis of family farmers all over the world north and south means that there is not only a big impoverishment of rural areas but also er it drives an immigration from rural areas to urban areas and er it isgenerating a huge hunger for the first time in history hunger’s basically rural.Well let’s move to Africa, to Nigeria, Er Doctor Olaseinde Arigbede. You’re from Nigeria, you’reboth a medical doctor and a farmer. You’ve got 25 hectares for maize, for yams, er for cassava and other vegetables.

Er represent the union of small and medium scale farmers there. What is the condition, what isthe state of health of smallholder farming in Nigeria? Well I’m glad you called it state of health and not just thinking about sustainability which has been abused so far, but state of health is very important. Now a nation, a nation requires people to work to feed it. It is the small-scale farmers who have fed our nations for ages. And these smallscale farmers have so many obstacles placed on their heads, on their shoulders, on their backs.

Governments disappoint them, they’re unfaithful to them, they neglect them, they deny their rights for support, because thosewho produce for a nation have a right to state support, they’re denied this right. At the international level good lord, all global bodies are ganged up against the small farmers. Why the hell are wefighting WTO, why are we fighting IMAF and all that? They are putting pressure on this farmer and claiming that this farmer is an anachronism which must disappear.Well let’s hear from Asia, from Esther Penunia. You’re from the Philippines. How important is thesmall farmer right across Asia?

National African Green Revolution Workshops

From October to November 2009 The Future Agricultures Consortium (FAC) in partnership with the Salzburg Global Seminar (SGS) and the Institute of Development Studies (IDS), conducted two international events on the theme of an “African Green Revolution” last year. In May 2008, FAC co-organised a high-level international conference: “Towards an African Green Revolution?” in Salzburg, Austria.

The conference presented a number of strategic recommendations to achieve a uniquely African “Green Revolution”. As a follow up to that conference, FAC organised three national-level workshops with nearly 100 smallholder farmers in Kenya, Malawi and Ethiopia. The recent workshops tested the strategies proposed for a uniquely African Green Revolution and included discussions on agriculture research to provide farmer input for the March 2010 Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development – in Montpellier, France.

The Kenya workshop took place at KARI (Kenya Agriculture Research Institute) in Kakamega and aimed to solicit farmers voices on issues of research and governance to lobby and advocate for improved policy outcomes at the Global Conference on Agriculture and Development (GCARD). It brought together about thirty representatives of producer associations, farmer marketing organizations, agricultural researchers and youth groups. The priority areas identified for further strengthening and funding included:

(i) agricultural production and marketing,
(ii) improving research and extension services,
(iii) developing innovations and protecting property rights.

The October 24th Malawi workshop in Lilongwe drew more than 35 farmers and a special call for women and young farmers resulted in significant attendance from these groups. Participants came from farmer organisations and representative farmers in different crops. The workshops were facilitated by Ephraim Chirwa, Mirriam Matita and David Hughes.

The workshop in Ethiopia took place on November 4th in SNNPR following two days of community consultation with three major cooperatives. The workshop was attended by farmer cooperatives, cooperative union managers, regional Cooperative Promotion Officers and zone and agriculture development officers. Reports from each of the three workshops will be available soon. Additional links to GCARD and the CGIAR change process are available on the FAC website.{jcomments off}

Pastoral Innovation Systems Perspectives from Ethiopia and Kenya

While there has been much discussion of the importance
of innovation in African agriculture, remarkably little
has focused on mobile pastoral systems. Everyone agrees
that science, technology and innovation must be at the
centre of economic growth, livelihood improvement and
development more broadly. But it must always be asked:
what innovation – and for whom? Decisions about direction,
diversity and distribution are key in any discussion
of innovation options and wider development
pathways.

In March 2009 over 50 pastoralists from across
southern Ethiopia and northern Kenya from a dozen
ethnic groups gathered in the Borana lowlands at the
‘University of the Bush’ to debate key pastoral development
issues.

Pastoral Innovation Systems

{jathumbnail off} Pastoralist_Innovation_SystemsThis project aims to generate debate about pastoral innovation options, focusing on pastoral areas of Kenya and Ethiopia, linking insights from pastoral areas to the wider debate about science and technology in Africa.

In March 2009 over 50 pastoralists from across southern Ethiopia and northern Kenya from a dozen ethnic groups gathered in the Borana lowlands at the ‘University of the Bush’ to debate key pastoral development issues. This week-long event was hosted by the Oromia Pastoralist Association and organised by the Democracy, Growth and Peace for Pastoralists project of the Pastoralist Communication Initiative. Intense and animated discussions took place under the trees next to a tented camp established in the Gujji pastoral area. The Future Agricultures Consortium was represented by Ian Scoones of IDS and Andrew Adwera of African Centre for Technology Studies based in Kenya.

A new FAC publication documenting the results of this workshop is now available: Pastoral Innovation Systems: Perspectives from Ethiopia and Kenya.  This is being widely disseminated in the region through PCI and FAC-Ethiopia and Kenya. The paper was made available at a donors’ workshop looking at pastoral issues in June 2009.

{jcomments off}

Ethiopian Economic Association

Ethiopian Economic Conference: Farmer Organisations and Social Protectioneea_conference_1

On 27 June 2009, FAC researchers Amdissa Teshome and John Thompson provided an overview of FAC activities and two keynote presentations at the Ethiopian Economics Association’s (EEA) Seventh Annual Conference was held in Addis Ababa from 25-27 June.

The presentations, one on Farmers’ Organisations and Agricultural Transformation in Africa and the other on Social Protection in Africa, both drawing lessons from Ethiopia, Kenya and Malawi and the policy briefs on Farmer Organisations are available at:


Ephraim Chirwa

{jcomments off}EphraimChirwaEphraim Chirwa is an Associate Professor of Economics at Chancellor College, University of Malawi. He holds an MPhil from Cambridge University and PhD in Privatization and Efficiency in Malawi from the University of East Anglia.

He has an interest in organisation and performance of markets, farming systems and performance, poverty and food security analysis, technology adoption and the agrarian question, social safety nets, microfinance and rural financial institutions.